Express HuntExpress Hunt
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • SPORTS
  • BRAND STORIES
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • OPINION
Search
  • Advertise
© 2022 Express Hunt . All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Supreme Court Examines the Legality of Article 370
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
OM SHRI BHAKTI: The World’s First Devotional AI OTT Platform Ushers in a New Era of Spiritual Technology
July 18, 2025
Harshkumar Badheka Joins Hands with Mujtaba Aziz Naza for Upcoming Song, Will Also Direct
July 11, 2025
USDT Thunder International Ltd Ignites a Global Crypto Revolution with DeFi-Powered Wealth Ecosystem
July 4, 2025
Jogesh Mahal: Two Decades of Crafting Memories in Agartala
July 2, 2025
Shaping Destinies: How Bright Future Academy Became Agartala’s Beacon for Government Job Aspirants
July 2, 2025
Aa
Express HuntExpress Hunt
Aa
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • SPORTS
  • BRAND STORIES
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • OPINION
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » Supreme Court Examines the Legality of Article 370
IndialawsuitnewsSupreme court

Supreme Court Examines the Legality of Article 370

Rudrakshi Gupta
Rudrakshi Gupta
Last updated: 2023/08/03 at 2:23 PM
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE
Supreme court  challenges abrogation of Article 370
Supreme court challenges abrogation of Article 370

In a significant legal battle, the Supreme Court of India has commenced hearing a batch of pleas challenging the Centre’s decision to abrogate Article 370 on August 5, 2019. Article 370 granted special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, making the matter a highly contentious issue among political parties and citizens alike.

A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, is presiding over the case, which has raised a crucial question regarding the provision’s revocation. The bench inquired about the mechanism for revoking Article 370 in the absence of a constituent assembly in Jammu and Kashmir. This question holds significance as Article 370’s temporary status was explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, and it could only be revoked with the recommendation of the constituent assembly.

The lead counsel for the petitioners, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, argued that the president cannot issue any notification to revoke Article 370 without the recommendation of the constituent assembly. He emphasized that Parliament’s act to revoke Article 370 was not constitutional but rather a political act. The core of their case is based on whether Parliament can assume the role of a constituent assembly and revoke the provision, claiming to act on behalf of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

The court referred to proviso 3 of Article 370, which grants the President the power to declare the article inoperative or operational with exceptions and modifications, provided that the recommendation of the state’s constituent assembly is obtained. However, with the constituent assembly’s tenure ending in 1957, the court is now tasked with interpreting the constitutional implications of this provision.

During the hearing, the court observed that no constituent assembly can have an indefinite life, leading to the critical question of what happens when the tenure of a constituent assembly comes to an end. The Supreme Court’s verdict will have far-reaching implications, as it will determine whether the revocation of Article 370 was constitutionally valid or not.

The hearing, which remains inconclusive, will continue on the following day. The court is conducting day-to-day hearings, except on Mondays and Fridays, to adjudicate this complex constitutional matter.

As a reminder, in 2019, the Indian government took the momentous decision to strip Jammu and Kashmir of its special status under Article 370 and bifurcate it into two union territories – Jammu and Kashmir (with legislature) and Ladakh (without legislature). The move led to both fervent support from BJP supporters and fierce opposition from major political parties.

The Supreme Court’s decision on the legality of the Article 370 abrogation will shape the course of India’s constitutional history and have significant implications for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. As the case continues to unfold, citizens and politicians alike await the court’s judgment on this critical matter of national importance.

You Might Also Like

Arun Matheswaran’s “Captain Miller” Makes Waves at the Box Office

India vs England Test Series Kicks Off with Exciting Offers

Cult Leader and Associates Ordered for Mental Health Evaluations

Indian Railways Takes Swift Action Against TTE Misconduct

Dua Lipa Advocates for Humanitarian Cease-Fire Amid Israel-Hamas Conflict

TAGGED: Article 370, Express hunt, India, News, Supreme Court
Rudrakshi Gupta August 3, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Copy Link Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Surprise0
Wink0
Cry0
Previous Article Canadian PM Justin Trudeau and his wife Sophie Announce Separation
Next Article Opposition Parties Consider “Censure” Motion in Rajya Sabha
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

OM SHRI BHAKTI: The World’s First Devotional AI OTT Platform Ushers in a New Era of Spiritual Technology
Brand Stories July 18, 2025
Harshkumar Badheka Joins Hands with Mujtaba Aziz Naza for Upcoming Song, Will Also Direct
Brand Stories July 11, 2025
USDT Thunder International Ltd Ignites a Global Crypto Revolution with DeFi-Powered Wealth Ecosystem
Brand Stories July 4, 2025
Jogesh Mahal: Two Decades of Crafting Memories in Agartala
Brand Stories July 2, 2025
Follow US

© 2022-2024 Express Hunt . All Rights Reserved.

  • About EH
  • Privacy Policy
  • Get In Touch
  • My Bookmarks
  • Our Authors

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?