A statement made by Union Minister Giriraj Singh, where he referred to Nathuram Godse, the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi, as a ‘saput’ (worthy son) of India, has ignited a controversy. Singh, a prominent leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), made the remark in response to remarks by AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi on Aurangzeb and Tipu Sultan. Singh argued that if Godse is considered Gandhi’s killer, then he should also be acknowledged as a son of the nation, unlike invaders like Aurangzeb and Babar. The comment has drawn criticism from various quarters, with Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy denouncing it as communal.
The controversy unfolded amidst a political slugfest over social media posts involving historical figures such as Aurangzeb and Tipu Sultan. Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’s remarks on “Aurangzeb ki auladein” triggered a response from Owaisi, who questioned Fadnavis’s knowledge on the topic and mentioned the children of Godse and Apte.
In response, Singh defended Godse as a ‘saput’ of India and criticized those who identify themselves as descendants of Babar and Aurangzeb, stating that they cannot be true sons of the motherland.
The comments made by Singh have sparked outrage, with many considering them highly controversial and communal. The statement adds fuel to an ongoing debate surrounding historical figures and their legacies, further intensifying the political tensions surrounding these issues.
The controversial nature of the remarks has led to calls for responsible and inclusive language from public figures. The incident highlights the sensitivity and divisiveness associated with discussions on historical figures and the need for constructive dialogue that fosters unity and understanding.
